Movement on a page is not free
Animation looks alive in a design review. For some readers it causes nausea or migraine, and for others it simply makes the page impossible to read while something moves beside the words.
Animation looks alive in a design review. For some readers it causes nausea or migraine, and for others it simply makes the page impossible to read while something moves beside the words.
Short answer
Motion on a website can cause nausea, dizziness and migraine for readers with vestibular conditions, and can distract anyone trying to read. Anything that moves for more than a few seconds needs a way to stop it. Operating systems expose a reduced motion preference, and a page should honour it.
People with vestibular disorders can feel real physical symptoms from large movement on screen. Parallax effects and content that slides as you scroll are the worst offenders.
People with attention differences find moving content beside text genuinely hard to read past.
And a proportion of readers with photosensitive conditions are at risk from anything flashing, which is why flash rate limits exist in the guidelines.
The symptoms are physical rather than a matter of taste. Nausea and dizziness from large on-screen movement are well documented, and somebody experiencing them leaves rather than files a complaint.
A slider that advances on its own is the most common offender on business sites. It moves while somebody is mid sentence, and it hides most of its content from everyone.
Measured behavior on carousels is poor almost everywhere. Most visitors see the first slide and never the rest.
If the content matters, put it on the page. If it does not, remove it. A carousel is usually a decision nobody wanted to make.
The guidelines are specific about content that moves, blinks or scrolls automatically for more than a few seconds. There must be a way to pause or stop it.
That includes tickers, animated backgrounds, looping video and auto-advancing slides.
The control needs to be reachable by keyboard and visible, not hidden until hover.
Every major operating system lets somebody ask for less movement, and browsers pass that request to your page.
Honouring it is a small amount of work: turn large animations off, or reduce them to a simple fade, when the preference is set.
Somebody who set that preference did so deliberately. Ignoring it is choosing your animation over their comfort.
Somebody who set that preference did so deliberately. Ignoring it is choosing your animation over their comfort, and honouring it is a few lines of styling.
Auto-playing video with sound is close to universally disliked and is blocked by default in most browsers for that reason.
Silent background video is gentler and still costs data, battery and attention, and still moves behind text somebody is reading.
If you use one, keep it short, keep it subtle, give it a pause control, and stop it when reduced motion is requested.
Ask what the video adds that a still image would not. Often the honest answer is motion for its own sake.
Ask what the video adds that a still image would not. Often the honest answer is motion for its own sake, which is the whole argument against it.
Content that slides, fades or moves at a different speed as you scroll is the effect most associated with vestibular discomfort.
It also delays reading, because the words are not there until the animation finishes.
Used sparingly on one section it can be fine. Applied to every block on a long page it becomes a fairground ride.
Used once, on one section, it can be a nice touch. Applied to every block it becomes a ride nobody asked to take.
Pages here do not auto-play video, do not carry auto-advancing carousels, and keep movement to short, small transitions that honour a reduced motion request.
Every page passes a check that runs before anything publishes, validated against Google Search Essentials and modern web standards.
The judgment a machine cannot make is whether an effect is pleasant or disorienting. Watch your own page once with fresh eyes, and once with the preference turned on.
Movement also costs load time and battery, which is the argument made from the performance side in page speed and search.
Short, small transitions are generally fine and can help explain what changed. The concern is large movement, long duration and anything that repeats indefinitely.
Usually yes. Most visitors never see past the first slide, so the content is hidden anyway. Laying it out as sections almost always performs better.
Browsers expose the preference to styling, so animations can be reduced or disabled when it is set. It is a few lines and it is widely supported.
Avoid it entirely. The guidelines set strict limits because rapid flashing can trigger seizures, and there is no design need for it on a business site.
15-day free trial. Card required. Cancel before day 15 and you pay nothing.