Using AI to improve internal linking
Internal linking is one of the few website jobs that is repetitive enough for a tool to help with and important enough to be worth doing. It is also one where a careless bulk pass can damage a site in minutes.
Internal linking is one of the few website jobs that is repetitive enough for a tool to help with and important enough to be worth doing. It is also one where a careless bulk pass can damage a site in minutes.
Short answer
A tool can suggest where internal links belong by matching subjects across pages, propose descriptive link wording, and list pages with nothing pointing at them. A person still has to approve each suggestion, because a link inserted into the wrong sentence misleads a reader and a bulk find-and-replace breaks things quietly.
Links between your own pages cost nothing, are entirely under your control, and shape both how visitors move and how your site is understood. Most sites barely use them, which makes this unusually cheap ground.
They also decide what is reachable for a reader, a crawler or an answer engine. A page nothing links to is effectively invisible, which our page on orphan pages covers, and large sites accumulate those faster than anybody expects.
The full case sits on our internal linking page. The short version is that a link inside a sentence, where the subject comes up, does far more than a list of links at the foot.
Find the places where a subject is mentioned and a page about it exists. That is a matching problem across a whole site, and it is tedious and error-prone when done by reading.
Suggest wording. Click here and read more are the two worst link texts in common use, and proposing a descriptive alternative is a task a tool handles well under review.
And report the structure. Which pages have no links in, which have far too many out, which sections are isolated from the rest. Our site check reports the same things mechanically.
Whether the link belongs in that sentence. A link is a promise about what the reader will find, and a suggestion that matches on a word rather than on meaning breaks that promise every time.
How many is too many. A paragraph with four links in it reads as spam and helps nobody. Judgment about density cannot be reduced to a rule that survives contact with real pages.
And the commercial decisions. Which pages deserve the most links pointing at them is a business question about what makes money, not a question about topical similarity.
The steps below exist because we broke a live page with a careless vocabulary pass on this site. A blind replacement across several files produced five separate breakages, including a rewritten link address.
Matching on a word that has two meanings. A page about licenses being linked from every mention of a software license, or a page about a trade being linked from an unrelated use of the same word.
Rewriting the address as well as the wording. This is the one that does real damage, because a link that used to work now points at a page that never existed and nothing warns you.
And over-linking the same target. Fifteen pages all linking to one page with identical wording reads as a pattern rather than as helpfulness, and it is a pattern quality systems recognize.
Inside the sentence where the subject comes up. That is where a reader is curious, and that is the link that gets followed. A block at the foot of the page is a weaker second placement.
In the hub page, pointing down at everything beneath it, and in each page pointing back up. That two-way relationship is what makes a section behave like a section rather than a pile of pages.
And from your most-read pages to the ones that earn money. Our page on link wording covers how to phrase those so the reader knows what they are getting.
Count the links in and out of every page after the pass. A page that gained twenty inbound links overnight is a page that will look engineered, because it was.
Follow a sample by hand. Ten links, opened and read in context, will tell you more about the quality of the pass than any report, and it takes about five minutes.
Then leave it alone for a while. Linking is not a thing to optimize continuously, and the sites that suffer most are the ones where somebody keeps adjusting it every month.
Enough that every subject mentioned with a page behind it is linked once, and no more. On a page of moderate length that is usually a handful inside the prose plus a short related block at the end.
You can, and we would not. Bulk passes match on words rather than meaning, and they occasionally rewrite link addresses as well as wording. Page by page with review is slower and does not break live pages.
Yes. Descriptive wording tells the reader and any machine what is on the other side. Click here and read more tell neither, and they are also poor for anybody using a screen reader to move between links.
The pages that bring in work, from the pages that get read. That is a commercial decision rather than a topical one, and it is the part of linking a tool cannot make for you.
15-day free trial. Card required. Cancel before day 15 and you pay nothing.